Jump to content


Icon Welcome to the FMCA Motorhome Forums!

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and signed in, you will be able to create topics; post replies to existing topics; upload pictures; manage your profile; get your own private messenger; create blogs; and more. Sign up now! Already have an account? Sign in. This message will be removed once you are signed in.


Photo
- - - - -

Improving Fuel Mileage


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#21 wolfe10

wolfe10

    Advanced Member

  • Moderator, Super
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,774 posts
  • Location:League City, Texas

Posted 17 July 2009 - 02:56 PM

Peak Torque of 1050 ft-lb is reached at 1400 RPM, it would be recommend for
best overall performance and fuel mileage, to run the engine at approx.
1700 RPM.


On my next trip at the end of this month I will try running at 1700 rpm to see if I get better fuel mileage. I can maintain these rpm at lower speeds by locking out 6th gear if needed. I also realize that tire pressure, breaking and terrain come into play here. Thanks for the info that you guys provided. It got me curious. I'll let you know if I improved my fuel mileage.

Road Dog

Road Dog,

Read VERY carefully the statement they give you. They did NOT, repeat NOT address what RPM to run the engine for best MPG. They gave an almost double talk answer of BEST OVERALL PERFORMANCE and fuel mileage.

You will get better MPG at closer to 1500 RPM if on relatively flat terrain (where it does not downshift on every upgrade). In rolling hills/mountains, you will need to run a little faster to get closer to "Best Overall Performance."

1500 and "economy mode" on the Allison will likely give you best MPG.

Brett Wolfe

Dianne and Brett Wolfe
1997 Safari Sahara 3540
Moderator, FMCA.com Forums
Chairman, FMCA Technical Advisory Committee
Member, FMCA Long-Range and Development Committee 2007-2009
Moderator, http://www.dieselrvclub.org/(FMCA chapter)


#22 Road-Dog

Road-Dog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 33 posts
  • Location:Salem, Oh

Posted 17 July 2009 - 03:17 PM

Brett......Thanks for the info. I do use the economy mode when I'm not in the mountains. I did notice on my last trip when I was running 55 and locked out 6th gear that it had real good power. I don't recall what rpm I was actually running. I'm getting old. LOL
Thanks again for the info.

Road Dog
Paul & Linda Hardin
U.S Army, Airborne, Vietnam
Retired Postmaster
2008 Phaeton - Freightliner Chassis - ISC 360Cummins
2009 Jeep Liberty

#23 Labrador47

Labrador47

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 18 July 2009 - 06:48 PM

I agree with Tom. Your criuse speed has a lot to do with your fuel economy. The wind is beyond your control.

We are running a Country Coach powered with a Cummins ISX 600-1850 lb.ft. torque and weighing in at 51,000+ on the 'CAT' scales at the travel center with full fuel and water.

We tow a Saturn Vue most of the time. I found that running at 68-70 mph on the highway was delivering me 6.5-6.8 mph on average.

A head wind is a curse! It can rob you of another 10-15% of your economy at almost any speed. It does seem that life is a head wind mose of the time.

We decided that we would slow down a little and attempt to save some money by cutting our criuse speed to 63-64 mph on those long runs.

Well, we are now enjoying 7.3-7.6 mpg now on a regular basis.

That big flat front on our coach really plows thru the air like a brick. The higher our speed the more wind resistance created.

We take a little bit longer to get to our destination but it is worth it. With diesel over $5.00/gal last year we learned a good lession. $.70c a mile just for fuel wasn't any fun. besides, in the scary event of a front tire blow out, controlling the wagon is a bit easier at 60 that at 70.

Bill Herring
F122708
2008 Country Coach Affinity
ISX600/Allison MH4000
Naples, Fl.
Toad-Saturn Vue

#24 Guest_Wayne77590_*

Guest_Wayne77590_*
  • Guests

Posted 13 September 2009 - 05:28 PM

We just completed about 600 miles round trip. After reading the information in FMCA Mag. I decided to check the theory (most likely fact). On past trips I ran about 64-65 MPH, with average much lower, pulling a 2007 Saturn Vue. My Fuel miles were 8.6-8.9.

So, on this trip I decided to do 55 MPH. I placed it on cruise control and it stayed there except when necessary to slow down, or going through lower speed zones. Nothing else changed except for speed and my MPG went to 10.4. Goin up I used the Interstate, and coming home I used Hwy-6

Since I took the toll way home from the North side of Houston, my wife started chiding me about my savings being spent on the toll road.

For a thousand miles, that is about a $40 savings at $2.50 a gallon. (That's a lot of ice tea)

#25 deenad

deenad

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 37 posts
  • Location:Vancouver, WA
  • I travel:With Pets

Posted 23 August 2012 - 10:21 PM

Peak torque on the ISC is 1400 rpm, on the ISL's it's 1300.

We have the Banks kit on our ISC 350 and have 1200 ft lbs from 1400 to 1700 rpm, I still try to run around 1600 rpm even so. I also find that, with the much wider torque band I run in "economy" mode most of the time.
Deen
2002 Newmar Dutch Star DP 4090 350/1050 W/Banks (now 435/1200)
Towing an '05 Honda Odyssey on KK-460 dolly
RV'ing since 1957
FMCA f47302s
Charter Good Sam Lifetime Member
NRA Benefactor/Recruiter

#26 FieldEngineer

FieldEngineer

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 29 September 2012 - 11:07 PM

Maximum fuel economy is achieved by operating your engine at the RPM where the BSFC, Brake Specific Fuel Consumption, is logged at its lowest. The engine manufacturer has this data. Also, in response to some who said that operating at RPM below torque peak damages the engine; this is only true if the engine will not acclerate smoothly if you step on the pedal. When you take off from a stop, you are operating at less than torque peak RPM and you also know that the engine acclerates without straining. Where operating at below peak torque (lugging) occurs, the engine will not accelerate under load....this is damaging specifically to the connecting rod bearing (upper half). Your auto trans should be set up to prevent this from occuring by downshifting accordingly.

Gary Spires
Retired Cummins Field Service Engineer

#27 AndyShane

AndyShane

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 98 posts
  • Location:Pecan Plantation, Texas

Posted 01 October 2012 - 04:41 AM

Wow. Great topic. I'll pay more attn to the peak torque rpm now, for sure.

I've noticed in general, the eastbound drivers are turning in significantly better mileage. Indeed, Caterpillar says in the guide Brett mentions that we can reap a 12% fuel savings from wind alone.

Plus, engines vary wildly: my C7 turns in the 7.2 avg of them all, which I can improve upon using the techniques you've been discussing. My buddy with his mammoth Libertyjust returned from a week of camping in Colorado, again beat 8.0 mpg for the trip, despite his heavier weight and 515 hp engine. Similarly, the couple from whom we bought our Fleetwood purchased a Newell and it got better mileage with more hp and a heavier bus.

2007 Beaver Patriot Thunder Winchester44 III C13 Caterpillar 525hp with Silverleaf system, Roadmaster 2000-1 pulling a Honda Crosstour
Defected from iRV2 in March 2012 due to an epidemic of trolling; once again contributing there as RVNeophytes2 effective Feb 6, 2013.


#28 mpoore

mpoore

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 01 October 2012 - 06:25 PM

Hello, As a first timer and non mechanical person, I'm open to suggestions. I have a Damon Intruder, 36 ft. Workhorse chassis, 8.1L engine, 345 HP, Allison transmission. I generally leave it in overdrive mode all the time. Is this a good idea or should I shut off the OD when in city traffic. When in OD it shifts into high gear at around 55 MPH and downshifts at around 50 MPH. The longest trip so far (I've only had it for 2 weeks) was around 350 miles in hilly but not mountainous terrain (not loaded and no tow vehicle) and I got 7 mpg exactly.

Thanks for any suggestions.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users