Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Rogue Wave WiFi Antenna


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#21 vtbigdog

vtbigdog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 154 posts
  • Location:W=Georgia S=Vermont

Posted 06 June 2011 - 04:52 PM

The Bullet M2 can be setup either way so you both are right. I have one and it works wonderfully in pulling in a stronger campgroung signal...as well as the WiFi at a McDonalds 1/4 mile away.
  • 0
Regards,

Richard

2003 Safari Trek 3011 W20
8.1 Workhorse / Allison

#22 mclavey

mclavey

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts
  • Location:Marengo , Illinois

Posted 06 June 2011 - 06:29 PM

What do you use as an antenna with the bullet m2? Do you know if the bullet will run DD-WRT software ?

thanks Marv.
  • 0
Marvin & Kathy Clavey
2003 Monaco Diplomat

#23 vtbigdog

vtbigdog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 154 posts
  • Location:W=Georgia S=Vermont

Posted 06 June 2011 - 08:05 PM

Go to http://www.ubnt.com/ to read all about it. I have an omnidirectional antenna attached to mone.
  • 0
Regards,

Richard

2003 Safari Trek 3011 W20
8.1 Workhorse / Allison

#24 mobiletaskmaster

mobiletaskmaster

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 28 July 2011 - 04:37 AM

The Rogue Wave antennas are okay, but there are options if you don't mind some DIY work and have an inexpensive USB wifi adapter handy. For a couple of years, I have had excellent long distance wi-fi connectivity using a modified parabolic satellite dish with a USB wi-fi adapter mounted at the focus. Much like the long range wi-fi antennas web page - you might do very will with something like that. For mobile connections, there's a helical that is very good and doesn't take up as much space compared to the parabolic antennas.

Cheers!
  • 0

#25 WoodLark

WoodLark

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
  • Location:South Carolina
  • I travel:With Pets

Posted 26 August 2011 - 09:32 AM

I realize this is an old topic, but I figured I would throw in my .02 worth anyway.

I am brand new to the forum (don't even have my motorhome yet, picking it up Monday). I traded in a trailer on the motorhome. In the trailer, I used a setup very similar to mclavey. I have an omni-directional antenna mounted on an 8 foot pole which I inserted into a flagpole socket on the trailer tongue. The antenna was connected to a Buffalo router running DD-WRT software in the "repeater" mode. I then connected my computer, printer, etc. to the router. I have had very good results with this setup. When I get the motorhome, I plan to mount the antenna to the roof ladder.

Everyone should keep in mind that wi-fi hot spots are not created equal. How good is their antenna? How much power are they running to broadcast the wi-fi signal? How good is the receiver they are using to receive your signal? All of these things can make a big difference in you ability to reliably connect to the internet, and none of them are under your control.
  • 0

#26 GaryAnnable

GaryAnnable

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts

Posted 21 April 2012 - 06:08 PM

I don't see anyone commenting on Yagi USB antennas? Am I the only one using one? I have mounted my 13 oz brass Yagi antenna on my Winegard TV antenna, and now have a 17 dBi directional antenna that is tunable from inside my rig. I've received signal, and logged on, to open systems from as far away as 4 miles (clear line of sight, @ Valley of Fire State Park, NM), so far!
  • 0
Melissa & Gary Annable
FMCA 397280
SKP 109352
Full Timing since 12/2010
2002 Safari Trek 2830 P30 Workhorse 8.1L
Geo Tracker

#27 DickandLois

DickandLois

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,624 posts
  • Location:Where ever the wheels stop ?

Posted 22 April 2012 - 01:47 PM

More information then most people will need ,but it covers things well.

WiFi Frequencies: What Channel is Right For Me?

In North America, one should always use either channel 1, 6 or 11 because all of the other channels overlap the frequencies of adjacent channels. In other words, using channel 4 interferes with everyone nearby using channels 1 AND 6! If you live in Japan, you may also use channel 14, but if you live in some other countries, it may not be legal to use any channel other than 11.

Wireless Standards - 802.11b 802.11a 802.11g and 802.11n
The 802.11 family explained

80211a
80211b
80211g
80211n
ieee standards

Home and business networkers looking to buy wireless local area network (WLAN) gear face an array of choices. Many products conform to the 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, or 802.11n wireless standards collectively known as Wi-Fi technologies. Additionally, Bluetooth and various other non Wi-Fi technologies also exist, each also designed for specific networking applications.

This article describes the Wi-Fi and related technologies, comparing and contrasting them to help you make educated network building decisions.
802.11

In 1997, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) created the first WLAN standard. They called it 802.11 after the name of the group formed to oversee its development. Unfortunately, 802.11 only supported a maximum network bandwidth of 2 Mbps - too slow for most applications. For this reason, ordinary 802.11 wireless products are no longer manufactured.
802.11b

IEEE expanded on the original 802.11 standard in July 1999, creating the 802.11b specification. 802.11b supports bandwidth up to 11 Mbps, comparable to traditional Ethernet.

802.11b uses the same unregulated radio signaling frequency (2.4 GHz) as the original 802.11 standard. Vendors often prefer using these frequencies to lower their production costs. Being unregulated, 802.11b gear can incur interference from microwave ovens, cordless phones, and other appliances using the same 2.4 GHz range. However, by installing 802.11b gear a reasonable distance from other appliances, interference can easily be avoided.

Pros of 802.11b - lowest cost; signal range is good and not easily obstructed
Cons of 802.11b - slowest maximum speed; home appliances may interfere on the unregulated frequency band

802.11a
While 802.11b was in development, IEEE created a second extension to the original 802.11 standard called 802.11a. Because 802.11b gained in popularity much faster than did 802.11a, some folks believe that 802.11a was created after 802.11b. In fact, 802.11a was created at the same time. Due to its higher cost, 802.11a is usually found on business networks whereas 802.11b better serves the home market.

802.11a supports bandwidth up to 54 Mbps and signals in a regulated frequency spectrum around 5 GHz. This higher frequency compared to 802.11b shortens the range of 802.11a networks. The higher frequency also means 802.11a signals have more difficulty penetrating walls and other obstructions.

Because 802.11a and 802.11b utilize different frequencies, the two technologies are incompatible with each other. Some vendors offer hybrid 802.11a/b network gear, but these products merely implement the two standards side by side (each connected devices must use one or the other).

Pros of 802.11a - fast maximum speed; regulated frequencies prevent signal interference from other devices
Cons of 802.11a - highest cost; shorter range signal that is more easily obstructed

802.11g
In 2002 and 2003, WLAN products supporting a newer standard called 802.11g emerged on the market. 802.11g attempts to combine the best of both 802.11a and 802.11b. 802.11g supports bandwidth up to 54 Mbps, and it uses the 2.4 Ghz frequency for greater range. 802.11g is backwards compatible with 802.11b, meaning that 802.11g access points will work with 802.11b wireless network adapters and vice versa.

Pros of 802.11g - fast maximum speed; signal range is good and not easily obstructed
Cons of 802.11g - costs more than 802.11b; appliances may interfere on the unregulated signal frequency

802.11n
The newest IEEE standard in the Wi-Fi category is 802.11n. It was designed to improve on 802.11g in the amount of bandwidth supported by utilizing multiple wireless signals and antennas (called MIMO technology) instead of one.

When this standard is finalized, 802.11n connections should support data rates of over 100 Mbps. 802.11n also offers somewhat better range over earlier Wi-Fi standards due to its increased signal intensity. 802.11n equipment will be backward compatible with 802.11g gear.

Pros of 802.11n - fastest maximum speed and best signal range; more resistant to signal interference from outside sources
Cons of 802.11n - standard is not yet finalized; costs more than 802.11g; the use of multiple signals may greatly interfere with nearby 802.11b/g based networks.

What About Bluetooth and the Rest?
Aside from these four general-purpose Wi-Fi standards, several other related wireless network technologies exist.

Other IEEE 802.11 working group standards like 802.11h and 802.11j are extensions or offshoots of Wi-Fi technology that each serve a very specific purpose.

Bluetooth is an alternative wireless network technology that followed a different development path than the 802.11 family. Bluetooth supports a very short range (approximately 10 meters) and relatively low bandwidth (1-3 Mbps in practice) designed for low-power network devices like handhelds. The low manufacturing cost of Bluetooth hardware also appeals to industry vendors. You can readily find Bluetooth in the netowrking of PDAs or cell phones with PCs, but it is rarely used for general-purpose WLAN networking due to the range and speed considerations.

WiMax also was developed separately from Wi-Fi. WiMax is designed for long-range networking (spanning miles or kilometers) as opposed to local area wireless networking. This is the format used for the 4G network data link.

The following IEEE 802.11 standards exist or are in development to support the creation of technologies for wireless local area networking:

802.11a - 54 Mbps standard, 5 GHz signaling (ratified 1999)
802.11b - 11 Mbps standard, 2.4 GHz signaling (1999)
802.11c - operation of bridge connections (moved to 802.1D)
802.11d - worldwide compliance with regulations for use of wireless signal spectrum (2001)
802.11e - Quality of Service (QoS) support (not yet ratified)
802.11F - Inter-Access Point Protocol recommendation for communication between access points to support roaming clients (2003)
802.11g - 54 Mbps standard, 2.4 GHz signaling (2003)
802.11h - enhanced version of 802.11a to support European regulatory requirements (2003)
802.11i - security improvements for the 802.11 family (2004)
802.11j - enhancements to 5 GHz signaling to support Japan regulatory requirements (2004)
802.11k - WLAN system management (in progress)
802.11l - skipped to avoid confusion with 802.11i
802.11m - maintenance of 802.11 family documentation
802.11n - 100+ Mbps standard improvements over 802.11g (in progress)
802.11o - skipped
802.11p - Wireless Access for the Vehicular Environment
802.11q - skipped
802.11r - fast roaming support via Basic Service Set transitions
802.11s - ESS mesh networking for access points
802.11T - Wireless Performance Prediction - recommendation for testing standards and metrics
802.11u - internetworking with 3G / cellular and other forms of external networks
802.11v - wireless network management / device configuration
802.11w - Protected Management Frames security enhancement
802.11x - skipped (generic name for the 802.11 family)
802.11y - Contention Based Protocol for interference avoidance

The Official IEEE 802.11 Working Group Project Timelines page is published by IEEE to indicate the status of each of the networking standards under development.

Rich.
  • 0

#28 charles10

charles10

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 50 posts

Posted 26 April 2012 - 03:30 PM

Reading all these answers I find quite interesting. What keeps coming to mind is recently I was reading about hackers driving down streets with laptops searching for open networks and getting passwords, etc. The way this article was written they could get every key stroke you did on your computer. We purchased Myfi from Verizon, supposedly secure. Like many others we do everything online, if we have a phone now we have secure service. (Forget most of Colorado mountains) We find most RV parks used the same service which was slow. poor,and you would get kicked off in a certain amount of time, that service company must have had good salesmen.
  • 0

#29 danorske

danorske

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35 posts
  • Location:Sunset Valley, Tejas
  • I travel:With Pets

Posted 19 July 2012 - 11:53 AM

Brett,
Are you still using this setup? Have you or would you make any changes?

Thinking of getting one.

Ron
  • 0

#30 wolfe10

wolfe10

    Advanced Member

  • Moderator, Super
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,794 posts
  • Location:League City, Texas

Posted 19 July 2012 - 01:26 PM

Ron,

Yes, I am using it right now! No changes. Compared with signal strength to other boosters in the same RV park, this one tops the list.

As others have posted, if you are an electronics guru, you can probably piece together a systems for less. But, if you want a complete system that anyone can install in minutes and use, I still put this one at the top.

Brett
  • 0

Dianne and Brett Wolfe
2003 Alpine 38'
Moderator, FMCA.com Forums
Chairman, FMCA Technical Advisory Committee
Member, FMCA Long-Range and Development Committee 2007-2009
Moderator, http://www.dieselrvclub.org/(FMCA chapter)


#31 danorske

danorske

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35 posts
  • Location:Sunset Valley, Tejas
  • I travel:With Pets

Posted 19 July 2012 - 03:38 PM

Ron,

Yes, I am using it right now! No changes. Compared with signal strength to other boosters in the same RV park, this one tops the list.

As others have posted, if you are an electronics guru, you can probably piece together a systems for less. But, if you want a complete system that anyone can install in minutes and use, I still put this one at the top.

Brett


Thanks Brett,
I think I'm going to order it now. I wonder if one could as easily install it onto the Wingman annenna on top of the coach. That way it would be high up and would lay down when on the road. Then run the wires into the coach through the roof with the rubber radio anntenna, into the cabinet above the windshield for a wireless router.

Havea good day,
Ron
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users