Thanks for the input Tom. You touch on a couple very good points. Financially, it is probably not smart - use vs cost just does not makes sense. It will be just a 'want to do this' as far as the monetary portion goes. What is primarily concerning us for this change is what you also touched on:
"The aggravation factor related to repair work may be lower on a newer motor home - or it may not - depending on how well the previous owner took care of the motor home. Even a brand new motor home has its repair list within a few trips. If you've got something good, stick with it."
As I research I am finding that as motorhomes have become more complicated so have the associated issues i.e. slide motors, slide seals, air bag issues, trailing arm and frame problems, heater problems, de-lamination etc. Our rig, like any RV has ongoing minor maintenance to be worked through but it seems simplistic compared to these newer rigs. Ours is looking much less complex and of course we are dealing with the known vs the unknown which is always more comfortable.
So to make a change, it probably is more philosophical than factual, and to try and understand who was building the most trouble free of these complicated rigs during the '05 to '08 period is probably our first step. We may hear from folks that the old '95 is built like a tank and they wish they had never changed, or they bought an '06 XX and never looked back.
I do appreciate folks chiming in, as a business analyst by trade it is tough for me to make these types of non-fact based decisions without some kind of supporting data - hahaha - my poor wife.
Troy R.