Jump to content

redldr1

Members
  • Content Count

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by redldr1


  1. On 4/8/2018 at 9:07 PM, Ohiolegend said:

    I HAVE PREVIOUSLY OWNED 3 Class A motor homes. All varied in size and weight and all got different MPG. I have just purchased a 2015 Forest River Sunseeker Class C motor home. It is 32' in length and has a V10 motor. What can I expect to get for MPG without pulling a trailer or car?

    Welcome to the forum.  Our 2017 Sunseeker GTS2800 was very close to your size.  It averaged 7.5 MPG with our Ford Edge flat towed behind it.  The best MPG I saw was in the low 10's the lowest was in the mid 6's.   Since I always had the Edge with us I don't know what impact it had on our gas mileage.  From what I've read a TOAD reduces your gas mileage around .5MPG.

     


  2. On 3/18/2018 at 7:05 AM, manholt said:

    So, please do not take it as a personal attack...:)

    I didn't take it personal...:)    I just see too many comments here on the FMCA forum that needs to be "clarified".  So in this case the take away is that 20 to 30 years ago some Class B / C chassis either didn't have any OEM sound deadening installed or the coach builder removed it.  I don't doubt those statements at all.   However to make a blanket statement that implies all current Class B / C units are like that is not correct. 

    It is ultimately the coach builder's responsibility to handle insulation and sound deadening for the entire unit.  I suspect the biggest problem in both the Class B and C is the chassis weight limitation.  Closely followed by the products price point.  If the manufacture skimps on padding it saves weight...and money.   When I get tired of it and add Lloyds carpets, or Dynamat, I'm the one losing rated cargo carrying capacity...and money.  That works out pretty darn well for the manufacture. :rolleyes:


  3. On 3/4/2018 at 8:02 AM, hermanmullins said:

    No disrespect to either Class B or Class C coaches. But Manufacturers begin both with the plainest units available and then build on them. Those units had absolutely zero insulation and possibly no heat shields over the catalytic converters and mufflers. In other words they made a silk purse out of a sow's ear and they do make some nice looking vehicles. 

    Herman

    LOL, Really?  A Class B or C cutaway chassis is a fully operable vehicle before the coach conversion.   Zero insulation?  That isn't the case with any Class C I've owned or even seen.  Believe it or not they do have insulation and sound deadening, not always enough :rolleyes: , but it is installed in the cab unit.  No heat shields?  Now that is a potential safety issue...show me some examples.  Better yet show DOT and NHTSA, I'm sure they would be very interested.    Just where are you getting your info?  

    On 2/22/2018 at 7:46 PM, kstockwe said:

    Has anyone added sound deadening to doors or the driver/passenger cabin floor on the Sprinter and if so, was it helpful?  There is lots of information out for sound deadening on Sprinter vans but mostly those are for empty cargo vans, not Pleasureway or Roadtrek type “built out” campers where only the front cabin is addressable.  I have not pulled off the panels yet but rather doubt these conversions address this aspect.

    The best addition I've made to any Class C chassis, as far as sound deadening, is a full cab Lloyds carpet mat.  They reduce sound, floor heat, and look a lot better than the rubber mats installed in most units.   The Lloyds mat made a huge difference in the M-B Sprinter based unit we owned.  See their website Here.


  4. 2 hours ago, MWeiner said:

    Wayne, maybe it's "bling" as you stated, but,  there's something nice about real "cherry wood" finishes and the nicely upholstered ceiling and interiors of the coach we purchased... when we shopped a number of Class C's, like the Navion and Fuse, I noticed that the cupboards were made of laminate or cheap particle board and hinges that were not well designed... resulting in more rattling while underway.... Now, the nature of RVs will lend themselves to more noises and rattle than most cars, but, I sure do care about the substance of the materials used long term...

    There's a pretty good reason why people care about how this is done and WHY they are impressed by the details in an Airstream or my unit... please remember that the Winnebago Navion or View (same model) is a Mercedes Benz diesel that was cutaway and they built an entire body on the back end....in order to do that, they had to cut corners on the interior finishes on the interior of the coach.   

    "Cut Corners" not necessarily....  The next time you are at a RV dealer or show check out an Dynamax Isata 3 M-B Sprinter Class C.  They are easily as nice as any Class B on the market....and we've looked at all of them.  Now to get that level of fit and finish you pay around $20-30K more than for the exact same M-B chassis, with the same floor plan, as on a Sunseeker / Forester MBS just like we owned.  The higher end fit and finish of a Dynamax is all you're buying along with a second year of warranty.   I won't toss that much money in to any depreciating asset just for appearance.  That's the same reason I usually drive Fords instead of Lincolns....;)

    Quote

    Heck, I probably have as much money in my 5 year old Roadtrek as you paid brand new for your coach??   I didn't want to take the super depreciation schedule in the first three to four years... besides we purchased it with only 26,000 miles.. just getting started to break in ...

    You've already spent way more...including my mods.  My MSRP was just over $100K, with every option except the diesel, and I didn't pay nearly that amount.   Here if you aren't getting at least 20-25% off MSRP you aren't trying...

    Quote

    The final decision came when the salesman for both the Navion and Fuse told me that the "roofs" of the brand new coaches, Navion and Fuse were "guaranteed" for 10 years... NOW, that sounds great.... EXCEPT, he went on to CLARIFY that this didn't cover the SEAMS! WTF....  

    The Roadtrek RS has a complete metal roof with rubber around the gaskets for the penetrations just like you would find on a car with a sunroof... and they didn't build a separate box on top of the chassis.... Now, it's possible to develop a leak anywhere... but, its NOT as likely as a complete fiberglass cap with seams running all over the place....  Bottom line for me, the Class B van conversion was going to be less maintenance...

    New Forest River Class C motor homes come standard with a one piece fiberglass roof.  The only roof seams are at the front and rear caps.  Those do require annual maintenance checks and may require re-caulking.   But I can always go to one of the vendors in the FMCA magazine, like RVRoof.com, and have a spray on roof added on top of the existing roof that is warranted against leaks and requires zero maintenance.  

    Quote

    I don't believe in making "suspension modifications" as you stated above... maybe a anti sway bar...?? Then , I would have to be convinced it was a good idea...the vehicle should be designed and perfected at the factory and ready for driving....

    What should be and what is are often two very different things.  M-B delivered a commercial cargo van that RoadTrek modified.  The suspension on a Sprinter from the factory is designed as a compromise that needs to handle various load, and road, conditions.   How much does you unit weigh when fully loaded?  How close to the 11,030 pound GVWR are you?   Knowing those two answers will help when considering any upgrades.

    Just upgrading the stock shocks can make a huge difference in comfort and handling.  Adding a Hellwig rear sway bar is something most Sprinter based rigs can benefit from as well.  The Hellwig provides so much improvement that Forest River now adds it on all their Sprinters our MBS was one of the first to have it standard.  Sumo Springs are another very popular addition for Class C conversions.

    Quote

    One thing I have noticed about camping.. it's nicer to be boon docking in a BLM land, for peace and quiet.... campgrounds and RV parks can be quite noisy and the camp fires with smoke permeating into your site can be really annoying...it's much quieter at home and I can be away from all this...

    As for your "not boon docking"...you probably could go out for a weekend and be fine... just have to wait for your water heater to kick back in .  One of the best and memorable places we stayed was a BLM land near Arches National Park...not many amenities, but serene .... here's a picture.. below Hittle Bottom  .. Only a few people there when we visited..cleanest pit toilets we've ever seen and nice park hosts as well....since we're over 62..with the senior park pass...it was only $7.50 per night...Lots of beautiful scenery there...highly recommend....

    We've boon docked in the past...and I agree it is much more peaceful.   Here in the southeast it isn't as readily available as out west...unless you consider BLM / COE type campgrounds to be boon docking...I don't.  The TS has a 35 gallon fresh water tank, a 30 gallon grey tank, and a 30 gallon black tank so cold water isn't an issue.  And we have a 9.8 gallon LP tank so if we want to boon dock it is "doable"...

    Quote

    I know this is quite a distance from your location...are you planning on taking trips all over the USA in your rig???? I noticed that you mentioned only "touring"....We tour as well, but, that 12,000 miles trip was a long distance.... Were planning shorter trips for a while... that was a lot of driving....

    We're planning a trip to Alaska and looking at Eastern Canada as well...  In the mean time we stay fairly active with the Forest River Owners Group (FROG) Rallies and non-group solo activities...

    Quote

    Do you have solar panels on your rig????  You can be quite self contained with solar...We are using a Zamp Solar system on our rig with two AGM batteries , 6 volt in series...works very well..

    We are "solar ready"... Our rig can standard with a Zamp interface but from what I've read that doesn't mean much.  That is on my list to check out before Alaska...  What are you doing?


  5. 16 hours ago, manholt said:

    Wayne. nice floor plan & a real shower! :)

    Thanks, we like it..:).  Downsizing from a 33 foot big "C",  with four slide outs, was a bit of a challenge but it works well for what we want.  For the first time ever I have more CCC ( ~2,300 pounds)  than cargo space!   All of our concerns revolve around hot water, see my post HERE,  but since we don't boondock it is an acceptable trade off... 


  6. 15 hours ago, MWeiner said:

    Of course the Forrest River is a Class C... not a Class B....

    I think that Class B+ is a marketing gimmick....

    I agree, B+ was  popular "sub-class" in the late 90's early 2000's then it pretty much disappeared.  Now I'm seeing it more again...  I see all RV marketing as a gimmick in a lot of ways.  Go look at a higher end Class C and you'll find the same appliances that are in a low end model.  I like to mention that to a sales person and watch them stutter.  And a Ford E450 cutaway chassis, Chevy 4500,  or a Sprinter cutaway, is the same commercial chassis no matter how much lipstick, like wood dash kits and ultra leather seats, that RV manufacturers put on it...

    15 hours ago, MWeiner said:

    When we purchased our Roadtrek... I test drove a Winnebago Navion and Fuse.. both were larger vehicles... with the big box in the back and overhang for bunk beds... driving dynamics didn't appeal to me...

    We weren't impressed with the small Winnies either...  They did feel a bit loose to say the least.  But there are a load of RV suspension enhancements advertised, for every Class and chassis, so I suspect many manufacturers would rather sell on "bling" than substance.   Those of us who do care end up doing suspension mods...:rolleyes:

    15 hours ago, MWeiner said:

    Yes, it's probably more expensive to maintain... BUT, I drove the 3.2 Ford Transit diesel... at least in my opinion, the 5 cylinder engine is not as responsive or smooth despite the specifications above-mentioned...you might have thought that the 3.2 would have more oomph...it didn't.. the extra large box in the back, with the wind drag and unbalanced swaying from not being directly over the wheels...( Back dual wheels on the Navion and Fuse) were slightly inset from the overhang of the coach. 

    ... I don't like 5 cylinder vehicles.... Not as balanced... just me.  And much noiser than the 6 cylinder 3 litre MB... Again, choices....

    The Ford diesel would have been a very hard sell, even if the numbers had made sense for me, as I don't like I-5s' either.  I remember too many of them that just didn't work out very well...  Interestingly enough the new 2018 F-150 diesel Ford just announced is a V-6...not the I-5.  Hmm....:huh:

    15 hours ago, MWeiner said:

    Finally, the finishing touches and details inside our Roadtrek RS Adventurous really made the Ford Transit and Winnebago Navion look cheap... didn't like that....

    There you go buying that "bling"!  ;):lol:   Every time my wife looks at the interiors of a Airstream Class B she comments on it.  I'm going to buy 5 gallons of polyurethane and dip my interior in it to give it that "bling"...:lol:  


  7. The Sprinter 3500 and Transit 350HD are direct competitors and I've owned both...  Here is my take on the issue:

    I used a proforma spreadsheet to compare the two engine options when purchasing our TS. I looked at the following items:

    Initial cost of the diesel engine over the base gas engine in the purchase price.  In the case of our Transit it is about a $6K option for the diesel.  Gasoline wins this round.

    Maintenance costs of the diesel versus the gasoline engine.  I pay around $50 for a oil change on my Ford every 7,500 miles, or every six months.  A Sprinter may be at 10K miles but how much is an oil change?  I can't even buy the M-B spec oil necessary for what I pay for the complete service.  Plus I don't have any diesel filters to purchase.  Gasoline wins again.

    The MPG of the diesel versus gas.  Our MBS, when it ran :rolleyes:, didn't do bad at 16-17MPG.  The Transit is getting mid 14's in comparison.  Now add in the extra cost per gallon of diesel, and DEF, over gas.  The fuel price per mile was very close...so close I would never see any payback worth discussing.  Right now around here diesel is running around $2.99 a gallon, gas is $2.49.  Diesel cost per mile at 17MPG divided in to $2.99 a gallon is 17.5 cents per mile.  Gas cost per mile at 14.5MPG divided in to $2.49 a gallon is 17.1 cents per mile.   And a gas engine doesn't need DEF.  Even so this round is close enough I called it a tie...

    Collectively those three items told me it did not make financial $en$e to "upgrade" to the optional diesel when we ordered our TS.

    Power?  I loose on torque...  Here are the posted numbers: 

    M-B Sprinter 3.0L V-6  Diesel:  188 HP and 325 ft-lbs of torque.

    Ford Transit  3.2L I-5 Diesel: 185 horsepower and 350 lb.-ft. of torque.

    Ford Transit 3.7L Gasoline:  275 horsepower and 260 lb.-ft. of torque.

    My 3.7L gas V-6 runs great and doesn't have any "power" issues..at least the way I drive.  I've driven I-75 thru TN and KY both ways and the cruise held 62MPH just fine through the mountains.  No, it isn't the Rockies...but it isn't flat either.  I admit it did down shift in to fifth gear on some of the longer steep grades.  Not bad considering that our TS weighed in right at 10,000 pounds when I had the RVSEF do a "four corner" weighing of our rig.  That is a little bit less, about 500 pounds, than our Sprinter based Class C weighed on a CAT Scale.

    Diesel resale?  Been their, done that...  With a M-B Sprinter and Ford diesel trucks, and SUV's, back when we had big travel trailers.  In my experience the resale value of a diesel is no better than a gas engine when you factor in the additional purchase price.  Sure you get more trade in but you paid more to begin with...in my experience it was effectively a wash in every deal.   As for the mileage not counting on a diesel it certainly does count around here!

    In most Class B's you aren't going to have an engine choice.  Any Sprinter based unit, currently the majority of Class B's, will be a diesel.  However in some Ford Transit based B's, like the Coachmen Crossfit, you can spec either engine.  Same thing with most of the small Forest River Class C's like ours.  That is the nice thing about the current RV market, everyone gets to choose what works best for them!


  8. 6 hours ago, MWeiner said:

    Question, you said that you only have 10 litres which is about one half of a 6 gallon water heater....??    Is that correct?

    Yes, that is correct...  It is not a big deal as long as you carefully manage your hot water usage.  And as I mentioned it has an outstanding recycle time in "Boost" mode.  Since we aren't "campers", we use our TS to tour, we are normally stopped at a campground with showers available anyway.  Might as well use those amenities I'm paying for! :)

    Quote

    AND, is the Truma Combi heating system quiet??? I noticed that our propane heater is a little noisy with the fan.... It's OKAY, and we kinda get used to it, but, I can see why people like radiant heating systems....

    While the Truma Combi water heater side is lacking it is an excellent furnace.   Very quiet, no fan roar, and it warms the coach very well.   Even so I usually use an electric ceramic heater as I see no reason to burn my LP while I'm paying for electricity in a campground.

    Quote

    Was there an opportunity to get a tankless system on your coach....

    No, that isn't an option in the Forest River Sunseeker / Forester family.

    The Truma brand is German and is designed for small Euro sized caravans.  After five years of living in Europe I know that most Europeans are more tolerant of small sized appliances than most Americans.  With RV downsizing in general I suspect the Truma Combi will start being more common in both Class B and Class C units as time goes by...

    Truma also make a on-demand water heater that is used in some Forest River Class A brands.


  9. On 1/29/2018 at 2:10 PM, wolfe10 said:

    Guess I need an education here-- Not aware of any Class B's longer than a long WB van.

    Brett,

    See Page 53 of this months magazine for the official FMCA B-Plus description ;).  The B+ description fits our motor home best but Forest River calls it a Class C.

     

    There is a third type of water heater being used in Class B's, and smaller Class C units, now.  We have the Truma Combi which is a combined water heater and furnace.  It is designed to save space and weight and it does do that...

    First the good:

    It is an excellent furnace.  In fairness we have small 25 foot unit, with no slide outs, so there isn't a lot to heat... 

    It is unbelievably programmable.  Dual fuel sources (LP and 115VAC), what mix level of the fuel sources, fast tank recycle or Eco mode, On and Off Timer Programing for the furnace and water heater, temperature control for both, and more.   It's very impressive for a RV system.  

    It heats water fairly well and has an excellent tank recycle time, roughly 10-15 minutes, when using both gas and electric in "Boost" mode. 

    Now the bad:

    10 liters of hot water is all the tank holds...that is roughly 2.6 US gallons.   When you have Truma Combi hot water management takes on a whole new meaning.  For example do not run any hot water in the bathroom sink while the wife is in the shower. :rolleyes: Adding a Oxygenics BodySpa shower kit helped on the shower side.... 

     


  10. 2 hours ago, MWeiner said:

    On average, how much would you say your maintenance costs run on keeping your motorhome, aside from trips and related expenses?  This would include routine maintenance, insurance and license fees....

    Mark,

    Since my mini Class C  is defined as a Class B+ by some manufactures I'll answer this one:

    Chassis Annual Maintenance:  $150.00  That is a oil change before going in to storage in the fall and another after coming out in the spring.  The services are performed at my local Ford dealer.  Ford maintenance prices are a much better than the OMG!  :blink: costs on the Sprinter based Class C we had...:)

    Insurance: ~$540 annually for full coverage thru Allstate.  USAA still won't insure a motor home...and I will not ever use Progressive, their partner in crime.:rolleyes:

    License Fees:  $1.00 a year for plate renewal.  We now get charged all the taxes up front in Georgia.  The Georgia Title Ad Valorem Tax (TAVT) is 7% on a new vehicle.  At least there is no longer an annual birthday "present" from DMV.

    Storage:  $1,800 annually for covered storage, with 15Amp AC power.   I could pay $1,200 annually for uncovered storage with no AC power but I like having a roof over my unit and being able to keep it plugged in whenever I want...  

    That what you were looking for?


  11. Larry,

    1. On our Edge there were multiple ground wires that run to the negative battery terminal.  It wasn't just a quick remove and replace to install the disconnect with a single cable.

    2.  Surprisingly we did not have any serious memory loss.  The Trip computer normally reset but the radio and GPS were usually fine. 

    3.  Other "gotchas"?  Well I'm not sure if it was directly related to towing but we had serious transmission issues with the Edge.  It developed an issue where it would "clunk", loud and hard,  if you were decelerating and then accelerated again.  This was most noticeable when coasting up to a Red light then accelerating again, on the Green, without coming to a full stop.   Our dealership did software reflashes, module replacements, and fluid changes trying to address the issue.  All of the fixes lasted about a thousand miles or so then our "clunk" returned.  Since it was running up on the 3/36 warranty we traded it in...

    We ran a 12VDC feed from the coach to the Edge to supply the power for the braking system and towing lights.  That was a easy way to power everything.  If you are going to do the battery disconnect I wouldn't bother with a charge line.


  12. 7 minutes ago, smithy said:

    How else do you suggest we make members aware about future votes? I can't think of any other possible way.

    I don't think it is all about making members aware of the issues and upcoming votes.  As you said there was plenty of info, on numerous sources, on the last vote.  But making it easier to vote should see an improvement in the "turn out" rate.  And I suspect implementing e-voting would also be more cost effective for the FMCA as well....


  13. 1 hour ago, Hermanmullins said:

    I am sorry but what I have seen on two different "votes by mail in ballots" had response on one of less than 1% of the members vote and the last had right at 12% vote.

    I'm not too surprised.  That is exactly why I suggested electronic voting.  Members would receive an email with the proposal and an embedded link to vote.  All they need to do is click on the link to respond and vote.  No printing paper ballots, looking for envelopes, stamps, and all the "snail mail" issues.  I suspect that e-voting would have seen a much better response rate, among the current membership, than the "snail mail" votes you mention.   And those who wish to vote by "snail mail" could still do so with a paper ballot included in the magazine as it was in the last vote.


  14. 3 hours ago, Hermanmullins said:

    My feeling  is if a person wants to have a say in how FMCA conducts business, then join a Chapter, get involved and become a National Director if they can be elected by the chapter.

    Too many arm chair quarterbacks. If you want to be involved, Suit Up and get into the game.

    Sorry, just my Soap Box for the Day.

    Herman  

    I disagree..  Why should I have to join a Chapter to have representation?  I pay the same FMCA dues as anyone else here and I should be provided equal representation.

    A possible solution is a polling software application along the lines of Survey Monkey that could be used for this purpose.  E-voting would provide all members an equal opportunity to vote on all issues.  The FMCA isn't so big that e-voting wouldn't work with the technology that is readily available today.   Maybe it is time to change the by-laws to allow for direct electronic voting? 

    This will become a much bigger issue with the vote to allow all RV's.  Those new members will expect equal representation and may not have a local Chapter that will accept them.

     

     


  15. We downsized to a small, 25 foot, no slide out, Class C  and dumped the TOAD...and don't miss it a bit.    For most trips we do not need a TOAD as we can visit every where we want to go in our Class C.  But then we are not "campers", we use our Class C to tour so we are generally moving on every day or two.  When we are going to be in a single spot for several days, with a lot of local or nearby attractions, I just call Enterprise and they deliver a rental car. 

    Having tried both I'm happy without a TOAD.  The smaller Class C is pleasant to drive, handles well, is easy to park, and meets the 25 foot or less length requirements in some national parks.  And I have yet to have a problem parking at a museum, driving in town, shopping etc...I'm sure there are some places I would but we haven't found one yet.   And best yet my wife enjoys driving it...it's nice to get a break from driving!

    If you research small Class C you'll find the number of smaller units with a decent TOAD tow rating is fairly small.  Most, but not all, M-B Sprinter based C's will be rated for around 3,500 pounds max tow weight.  Ford Transit based units like ours are rated at around 2,000 pounds so almost any car is out...  Forest River makes some E450 based 25 foot C's, like the Sunseeker GTS 2430S, that could easily pull a big TOAD.   I'm having a hitch added to our new C to allow for using our bike rack, our bicycles will work in a lot of places as well.  And a trailer with a Polaris Slingshot just may be in my future.

    Try going TOAD less, the worst case scenario is you'll end up renting a car... 

     


  16. Been their, done that...  We currently have USAA for our home and auto policies.  USAA will not insure any motor homes but they will insure trailers.  They also do not insure motorcycles, boats, or private aircraft, at least in Georgia.  USAA customer service will transfer you over to their "partner" Progressive, who will probably be 25-30% higher than you can find at just about any other insurer.  If you chose to use USAA, and do not use Progressive for the vehicles they do not cover, they will not sell you an umbrella policy.  You'll be referred out to yet another third party insurer for that...who interestingly enough is cheaper than USAA for the exact same coverage! :huh:  I really need to attend a share holder meeting in San Antonio...

    I use Allstate for our motor home as it is a much better deal than anything I was offered by either Good Sam or FMCA's partners in crime. 


  17. It isn't electrical wiring concerns that made me go with a TowMate light bar.  Some of the newer vehicles have LED lights, like those on my Edge, that are sealed units to help keep moisture away from the LEDs.  If you drill any holes in the light fixture you potentially allow moisture in to the light fixture.  That could easily turn in to a warranty question if a light fixture fails.

    How likely is a LED light to fail?  In the past three years I had the right rear turn signal assembly on our 2013 Ford Flex partially fail.  Half of the LEDs stopped working.  It was replaced under warranty and the repair invoice showed about $500 for the light assembly.  We later traded in the Flex for our current Edge.  The Edge had the left rear tail light assembly totally fail, at about 6 months, the warranty parts invoice on it was $650 for the light assembly.   In both these cases I'm darn glad I didn't have any debating about holes drilled in the light fixture. 

    We use the TowMate RVHW32 Wireless RV Tow Light Package.   I avoid any warranty questions and I can easily move it between vehicles when we change TOAD's.  It was well worth the roughly $250 cost to me to avoid any potential issues.  And once you deduct the price of a traditional wiring kit, and installation costs, the TowMate looks even better.


  18. 11 minutes ago, Wayne77590 said:

    I have a 2013 Lincoln MKX and it is the same as the Edge in many aspects.  After 4 hours on the road the battery would be dead.  My fix for that until I can get a charge line installed is that every couple hours we stop for stretch and other niceties.  I start the car and let it run for 5 minutes, then off we go again.  Works well for us.

    If everyone would do that we wouldn't have manufactures wanting to disconnect the toad battery.  :) 


  19. 9 hours ago, lenp said:

    Could you simply install a charge line from the coach to the toad to keep the battery charged all the time?  that is what I did to my F150 after running the battery down one night when I left the auxiliary brake connected.

    Lenp

    Yes, that would be my preferred solution...  But when I asked about it everyone at Ford followed the Owners Manual "guidance".  Since our Edge had less than 500 miles on it when all this was done I followed their directive.  For the $200 for the battery disconnect installation it wasn't worth worrying about any warranty questions caused by not following Ford's directions.

    Another way to handle this is to put in a disconnect, as Ford recommends, and then use an aftermarket fused connection directly to the Edge battery to power the toad brake and lights.  Then you wouldn't even need a charge line.  Just remember to run your engine every evening to recharge the battery.

     

     

     


  20. I have a 2016 Edge and had my Ford dealer install a Blue Sea 500Amp cutoff switch on the negative terminal.  On Page 234 of my Owners Manual, in the Towing Section, Step 4 for Keyless entry has you disconnecting the battery.   Be very careful how you do this as there are three ground points off the negative battery cable.  The one on the fender well stud, for jump starting, one on the engine, and one goes to the electronics.  All in a single piece bundled wiring harness.  This is not for the faint hearted to trace, I worked with my local Ford dealer for several hours figuring this one out!

    Now for the "gotcha"...  If you disconnect the battery you obviously kill the factory power outlets you need for your brake system and in my case tail lights.  To power the Blue Ox Patriot system and the TowMate 32" Wireless Brake and Tail lights we use I ran 12VDC from the coach 7 pin connector in to the Edge.  I then connected that to two power outlets I installed under the dash that allow the Patriot and TowMate to plug in to them.   

    My Edge has all LED lights in the rear.  I wasn't willing to modify them as I know from a previous Ford just how expensive those LED light modules are...  So that is why I went with the TowMate wifi system.  The gotcha here is the whole rear of my Edge is either glass or plastic on the horizontal flat areas.  I used an old hitch with a piece of 2X2 inch tube welded to it to mount my lights.  

    The way my Edge is wired now the only mod to the factory wiring is the Blue Sea cutoff.  Everything else is wired on easily removable two wire pre-made cables made to be used with a Deltran Battery Tender.  If you want more details and the Part Numbers let me know...

    One other "gotcha":  I highly advise you to have a couple regular keys made for the drivers door as the "key" in the fob is next to useless.

    FWIW:  I could not get an official answer from Ford on why you need to disconnect the battery.  Prior to 2016 it wasn't in the Owners Manual.  What I was unofficially told is too many folks were killing their Edge's battery due to the toad's auxiliary braking system.  If you leave the battery connected every time your toad brake system depresses the brake pedal it "wakes up" the vehicles electronics as it thinks you are getting ready to start the car by putting your foot on the brake.  And the system stays active for several minutes each time.  The cumulative effect is to kill the battery...  Since I was modifying a brand new Edge I followed Ford's guidelines to the letter.  I don't want any potential warranty claim issues.  That is also why I had my Ford dealer modify the wiring harness instead of a third party.  I freely admit this was overkill on my part...

    BTW the Edge tows great!

    Regards,

    Wayne

     

     

     

     

    GTS_and_Edge_Rest_Stop.jpg


  21. Hello,

    My wife and I recently purchased our first motorhome a 2016 Forest River Sunseeker 2400W MBS. We chose the 2400W for its open floor plan and the M-B Sprinter chassis. It is normally just the two of us and the 2400W makes an ideal sized "couples coach" for us. Ordering it allowed us to customize it a bit and set it up the way we wanted. Prior to our "W" we owned several travel trailers ranging from small hybrids up to big slide out units. I just finally got tired of hooking and unhooking travel trailers! :rolleyes: Last week we visited Acme Dolly Company and picked up a dolly for our Ford C-Max so I think I have most of the big bases covered now.

    We are interested in chapters in our general area and touring. We have plans to visit Glacier NP and Yellowstone NP next summer and then Alaska in 2017. Plus I'm always trying to learn more about our RV's and enjoy modding them to make them more comfortable for us.

    Regards,

×
×
  • Create New...