1943buck

Will FMCA policy be any different than GS. It seems it not so much the sponsor, but more the insurer selected by the sponsor. It is difficult to put thousands away for repairs of the future, but rather hold the insurer accountable. The intent is to cover expense less deductible for the RV. It should not be rocket science for the insurer to know the actuarial cost for rv expenses and come forth with a priced policy that removes the angst from claims. The insurer should insist for claims a process that is fair, but provides cross country coverage of acceptable, reliable repair facilities. Down time for the RVer is also important and should have expenses paid by the insurer for such circumstances. So, if this would be the case, then perhaps we could not afford the policy and in fact would not get a policy in favor of moving the risk to our wallets.

One: Charles R (Buck) Eller Two: US Army Three: Active Duty 1966-1978, Reserve 1979-1983 Four: Major USAR Five: Combat Engineer Six: Viet Nam-(I Corps), Europe(Goeppingen, Neu Ulm, Stuttgart) US (Ft. Belvoir, Texas A&M, Michigan Tech University, Ft. Benning, Ft. Gordon, Ft. Leornardwood