Details please..... specifically who voted to double the cost of membership to keep this very expensive benefit? When you state "our members overwhelmingly want it to continue", is this anecdotal from your informal conversations at the fairgrounds at Redmond before the EB meeting or was it from asking for a show of hands from 150 people when giving away $250 gift cards? Neither scenario would represent the sentiment of the entire membership. I receive various monthly emails from the Association, the digital magazine and was at Redmond in August. Did I miss any communications asking the general membership for input on keeping or rejecting FMCAssist? Were any details offered to facilitate an informed decision by members to decide if they want FMCAssist? Something this important, something that causes such a tremendous financial impact on already strained resources should be put to a vote by the entire membership. The collateral damage caused by this one decision will be devastating and accelerate financial loss and membership erosion. In my opinion, to move forward with this very significant decision without an absolute clear mandate from the entire membership is selfish. I will let my membership expire at the end of its current term.